Search for: "Chick v. Chick" Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 3:30 am by propertyprof
As many of you probably heard, public officials in Boston recently declared that Chick-Fil-A (a fast food chain that specializes in fried chicken sandwiches) would not be welcome within the city limits because of the anti-gay sentiments expressed by the... [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:12 pm by Steve Baird
Where do you come down on the “Eat Mor Chikin” v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Burning Man’s Burning Marks Nike 3, Jesuits 0 [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:40 pm by Steve Baird
New York Times Covers “Eat More Kale” Trademark Dispute Chick-fil-A Goes Stealth in “Eat More Kale” Trademark Dispute? [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:27 am by Dan Gauss
Nothing else explains the Mayor’s decision to issue a public letter to Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy, blasting Mr. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by Jeff Lipshaw
The chestnut case for the bucket game of "social change" and "commerce" is Dodge v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 5:26 pm by Howard Bashman
Mitchell, credited as the devious mind behind Texas’s S.B. 8, presumably demonstrates that he knows how to correctly pronounce “Chick-fil-A”: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Texas heard oral argument in Von Dohlen v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:14 am
” She was first to raise Chick-fil-A leaders’ politics during a Tuesday committee hearing. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 11:18 am by Walter Olson
-Chick-fil-A here, here (diversity of views within ACLU), here, etc., and my writing elsewhere] In Board of Commissioners, Wabaunsee County v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:34 pm
However, Florida's First District Court of Appeal recently ruled in Glaze v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by Nasir Pasha, Esq.
This has serious implications for its new sick leave laws and stance toward Chick-fil-a The post San Antonio v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am by SHG
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing explains decision in United States v. $167,070 in United States Currency: It begins with the flimsiest of “reasonable suspicion” and heads downhill after that. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court held, by a 7-2 vote, in Board of Comm'rs v. [read post]